|
|
In order to seek to reverse this trend, the Schröder
government has been at the forefront in the debate
concerning the necessity of establishing German
elite universities. According to the concrete plans, a
small number of German universities should already
have been declared elite-universities. The education
minister Ms. Buhlmahn did however not succeed in
realising her plans for elite-universities on schedule.
Education "made in Germany" What went wrong.
Ever since the discussion about elite-universities
has been running in the press and has been a part
of the public debate, it has been clear that Germany
needs top tier universities, or more precisely,
Germany needs excellent research opportunities
and facilities to ensure that the smartest heads
remain in the country. This new wave of research
would give industry and the economy in general
important innovative impulses. For this reason, billions
of Euros ought to be spent on a small selected
group of German universities, so that these in turn
may transform themselves into German Harvards
and Oxbridges. This is the common ground and the
apparent logical explanation of what needs be done.
It could however be argued that those involved in
this discussion, especially politicians, lack important
in-side knowledge and appear not to know the real
strengths and weaknesses of the German university
system, and that therefore inadequate analysis have
been made. Here are a few truths which ought to
be generally known and not only to insiders of the
education system:
> The average quality of the often highly praised
American universities is notably poor; Less than 10%
of American Universities and Colleges can match
the level of the Abitur, the German school leavers
diploma. (The top 1% of US Universities are at the
same time undoubtedly in a class of their own)
> German students abroad tend to study at the
absolute top universities in the respective countries
> Germany does not spend less on education than
other countries. The big difference (in particular to
the US) is that private donations to universities are
virtually non-existent in Germany.
> Germany has a leading position when it comes
to engineering science, and German engineering
education enjoys a higher reputation worldwide
than the corresponding Anglo-American education.
> In some parts of the world such as Latin America,
China and the Arabic countries German education
or German business practices holds a better
reputation than the Anglo-American alternatives.
> Germany has through its institutes such as
"Max Planck" and "Fraunhofer" for years conducted
world-class research. These institutions are however
not counted as universities.
There are, nevermind of these corrective truths
few reasons to glorify German universities:
> Universities are mostly measured on the quality
of academic publications and the actual quality of
education is not properly assessed.
> Nearly all graduates and doctorates find their
way into industry; university education is at the
same time still strictly based on the academic ideal
of primary research.
> Unclear degree programmes without defined
durations reveal deficient structures and organisational
arrangements
> The bureaucratic ways in which German Universities
are organised make them unattractive for
overseas students. In a global context, German universities
hence remain marginalised.
What characterises a real elite institution
Regrettably, very few front bench politicians have a
background from an elite university (an exception to
this is the former German president Richard von Weizsäcker
who graduated in Oxford). Moreover, German
politicians are, in contrast to their French or American
peers, not recruited from a small number of elite-institutions.
It might be difficult even for those who have
studied at a top overseas institution to exactly define
and appreciate what characterises an elite-university.
As can be seen in Fig. 1 the focus lies on a consequent
emphasis on the actual education of students from
selections procedures to alumni networking: It is all
about creating optimal conditions and opportunities
for personal development for the brightest heads
and consequent potential future leaders.
Whereas traditional German universities fail when
it comes to focusing on important facets, which characterise
elite-education, it is to be noted that ESB
Reutlingen (like the private schools WHU and EBS)
fulfil most of these criteria.
The fact that German mass education universities
now suddenly are to be turned into elite institutions
is more than questionable. After all, hardly
any of these universities fulfil the elite criterion.
Even if public spending on elite institutions was to
be increased, one might rightly fear that none of the
elite-criteria will be reached, as long as the strongly
rigid system and outdated tradition of the role of civil
servants in German universities is not fundamentally
changed. As shown is Figure 2, the CHE analysis reveals
how unconvincing the aspirations for elite universities
in Germany are, and furthermore, that ESB
Reutlingen would have something to offer to those
who dream of elite universities in Europe’s largest
economy. This in itself should be reason enough for
ESB to raise its voice in the elite-discussion.
The unpromising discussion on elite-universities
in Germany is all the same an excellent opportunity
for ESB to strengthen its own strategies: The mere
fact that ESB was different right from the beginning
is the reason behind this rare German success story.
The foundations for this success were laid when
Prof. Dr. Hans Tümmers, the founder of ESB, 25 years
ago designed an internationally orientated German
business school, which was to be based on a practice
orientated French Grande Ecole. ESB graduates
all have broad international experience, possess
first-rate analytical skills, and are able to excellently
master time management. Today’s top employers
certainly know to appreciate these qualities. In relation
to its 150th anniversary, this clearly is a very nice
present to Reutlingen University.
|
|
|
|